| Ergonomics is the study that deals with the interaction
between humans and the environment. Recent studies by the U. S. National
Institute of Occupational Health and Safety have shown that productivity
in the workplace increases as a direct consequence of seating with
ergonomic considerations. A well designed chair is comfortable and it
supports the key areas of the body without restricting movement.
Comfort and productivity in the office are based on many conditions.
Simply put, ergonomics means FIT - fit of the tools to the worker,
the work environment and the tasks performed. These can include physical
elements such as furniture, equipment, lighting and working space per
person; environmental factors such as acoustics, temperature, humidity and
air quality; and working methods themselves.
Ergonomics - the study of efficiency of persons in their place of work
- considers all these factors as being equally a part of the office
environment.
The science of designing environments and products to match the
individuals who use them began during World War II. It was noted that
"pilot errors" in aircraft accidents were often related to flaws
in cockpit design.
A catch-all phrase in today's working environment is "repetitive
strain injury" - "RSI". RSI includes a wide number of
ailments resulting from strain to shoulders, arms, hands, and sometimes
the back. More and more, product designers are recognizing that RSI injury
is cumulative, can build slowly, and may take years to surface as a
chronic health problem.
Poorly designed or improperly adjusted office furniture can cause the
user great discomfort. With proper knowledge of the capabilities of the
furniture, individualized comfort and positive new levels of productivity
can be achieved.
Some factors are as simple as proper adjustment and operation of
existing office furniture and equipment, and more efficient organization
of the basic work flow.
Modular equipment and furniture permit individual components to be
adjusted for specific tasks and positioned for personal preference. Work
surfaces should provide the opportunity to place materials and equipment
related to the current task within easy reach. Materials not required
constantly during the job performance should be in accessible storage
areas located near the main work area.
The Primary Workspace is the area swept by arm motions pivoting at the
elbow with slight shoulder movement and no upper body twisting. This main
area is used for a variety of basic tasks including writing, reading and
computer work. The size or span of the primary workspace should complement
the task being performed.
Consider the flow of work through your workstation in a typical day;
you'll find a number of distinctive and repetitive task patterns.

The Need for an Ergonomics Standard
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) currently
account for one-third of all occupational injuries and illnesses reported
to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) by employers every year. These
disorders thus constitute the largest job-related injury and illness
problem in the United States today. In 1997, employers reported a total of
626,000 lost workday MSDs to the BLS, and these disorders accounted for $1
of every $3 spent for workers' compensation in that year. Employers pay
more than $15-$20 billion in workers' compensation costs for these
disorders every year, and other expenses associated with MSDs may increase
this total to $45-$54 billion a year. Workers with severe MSDs can face
permanent disability that prevents them from returning to their jobs or
handling simple, everyday tasks like combing their hair, picking up a
baby, or pushing a shopping cart.
Thousands of companies have taken action to address and
prevent these problems. OSHA estimates that 50 percent of all employees
but only 28 percent of all workplaces in general industry are already
protected by an ergonomics program, because their employers have
voluntarily elected to implement an ergonomics program. (The disparity in
these estimates shows that most large companies, who employ the majority
of the workforce, already have these programs, and that smaller employers
have not yet implemented them.) OSHA believes that the proposed standard
is needed to bring this protection to the remaining employees in general
industry workplaces who are at significant risk of incurring a
work-related musculoskeletal disorder but are currently without ergonomics
programs.
OSHA's Proposed Ergonomics Standard
Ergonomics is the science of fitting the job to the worker. Ergonomics
programs can prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) that
occur when there is a mismatch between the worker and the task. Each year
1.8 million workers experience injuries related to overexertion or
repetitive motion, and 600,000 are injured severely enough to require time
off work. OSHA's proposed standard is designed to help prevent these
injuries.
THE Champion MVP
Chair
MEETS / EXCEEDS OSHAS STANDARDS
What are the Benefits?
- 3 million MSDs will be prevented over 10 years, an average of
300,000 per year.
- 27.3 million workers at 1.9 million worksites will be protected.
-
$22,500 savings in direct costs for each MSD prevented.
- $9 billion average savings each year. (Currently MSDs cost $15 to
$20 billion in workers' compensation costs with total costs as high as
$45 to $60 billion each year.)
What is a Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder?
A musculoskeletal disorder is an injury or disorder of
the muscles, tendons, ligaments, joints cartilage and spinal discs. To be
considered covered, an MSD injury must be:
- Diagnosed by a health care professional, result in a positive
physical finding or serious enough to require medical treatment, days
away from work or assignment to light duty work-i.e., an "OSHA-recordable"
injury.
"The ergonomics program we proposed provides a
practical, flexible approach to preventing musculoskeletal
disorders," said OSHA Assistant Secretary Charles Jeffress. "It
reflects industry's best practices by focusing on jobs where problems are
severe and solutions are well understood. America's workers have waited a
long time for this standard."
OSHA announced the ergonomics proposal on Nov. 22,
1999, after 10 years of study, consultation and analysis. Stakeholders,
including employer organizations, small business owners, labor unions,
safety and health professionals, were involved in the process. It is
expected the standard will spare 300,000 workers from painful, potentially
disabling injuries and save the U.S. economy $9 billion each year.
This following describes some of the economic and
social costs associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders. This
information can be used as an indicator of the magnitude of the burden
imposed on the U.S. economy by these disorders. However, OSHA recognizes
that the estimates of musculoskeletal injury-related costs presented in
this chapter understate the real financial and social costs involved. This
is the case both because some of the actual monetary costs are not fully
captured by available economic methodologies and because the human toll,
in terms of pain and suffering, cannot be satisfactorily expressed in
economic terms.
The extent of the burden imposed by work-related
musculoskeletal disorders is suggested by the annual count of such
injuries and illnesses and estimates of the costs they impose. In 1997, a
total of 626,000 MSDs reported by employers to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) resulted in days away from work. This represents
one-third of all work-related lost workday injuries and illnesses reported
to the BLS each year. The total number of work-related MSDs, including
those that do not lead to days away from work, is estimated to be three
times as high.
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are also
disproportionately severe: The average cost per claim for upper extremity
and lower back musculoskeletal disorders is approximately twice that of
the average workers' compensation claim ($8,075 for upper extremity
musculoskeletal disorders and $8,320 for lower back musculoskeletal
disorders, compared with $4,075 for the average non-MSD workers'
compensation claim) (Webster and Snook 1994a,b). BLS data show that, in
1996, the typical MSD led to almost twice as much time away from work as
the typical lost workday injury. These increased costs and time away from
work are a direct result of the greater than average likelihood that these
disorders will require intensive medical treatment and/or result in
long-term disability. In the State of Washington, for example,
approximately 40 percent of accepted workers' compensation claims for
occupational carpal tunnel syndrome result in surgery (Adams, Franklin,
and Barnhart 1994). Among employees receiving such surgery, 48 percent are
still unable to return to work one year after surgery (Adams, Franklin,
and Barnhart 1994).
Clearly, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are
imposing an enormous burden on workers, employers, and society at large.
One study (Sokas, Spiegelman, and Wegman 1989) states that "musculoskeletal
disorders rank second only to cardiovascular disease as a cause of
disability in the United States...in total economic cost...including
direct medical costs and indirect costs due to lost earnings and
productivity." Because work-related musculoskeletal disorders
represent the single largest preventable occupational safety and health
problem in the United States today -- whether measured in sheer number of
cases, extent of disability, or loss of productivity -- promulgating an
ergonomics standard is consistent with OSHA's policy of attacking more
serious occupational injuries and illnesses first.
The potential benefits that will be experienced by
workers, employers, and society at large if these work-related
musculoskeletal disorders are reduced in number are simply the other side
of the costs they currently impose. Not surprisingly, these benefits are
very large, both in terms of reduced pain and suffering and savings in
medical, compensation, and other costs.
Some of the losses associated with lost time due to
work-related injuries and illnesses stem from the lost output of the
worker, which can be measured by the value that the market places on his
or her time. This value is measured as the worker's total wage plus fringe
benefits. Other costs include: (1) medical expenses, (2) costs of workers'
compensation insurance administration, and (3) indirect costs to employers
(other than those for workers' compensation administration). |